Can an ATE policy be good security in a claim where there are allegations of dishonesty or fraud?

Matthew Amey of TheJudge recently wrote an article for Practical Law on the High Court’s judgment in Saxon Woods Investment Ltd v Francesco Costa and others [2023] EWHC 850 (Ch). He considers the questions the court will examine when deciding whether an after the event policy or an anti-avoidance endorsement can act as security in cases involving allegations of dishonesty or fraud.

To read the full article, click on this link

Reproduced from Practical Law with the permission of the publishers. For further information visit www.practicallaw.com.